Magic Bookshelf Online

Exploring the Children’s Reading World with Parents and Educators –

Dick and Jane as comparative lit? September 9, 2008

In recent years, parents of grade-school children, and even those of preschoolers, have witnessed the disappearance of what we always thought was a staple of little kid school life: recess.

Then last year, we Atlantans had to relearn for our grade-schoolers the math we’d struggled so to learn the first time around: a “new” new math, as it were, requiring that students document in writing the answer to every problem. It’s no longer enough to come up with the right answer; now children have to explain their answers. Their answers to simple subtraction problems now look like geometry theorems. (For proficient math “guessers” like me, it would never have flown.)

Now, apparently this same penchant  to overthink the thought process seems to have infiltrated Ontario, Canada’s elementary classroom reading circles. It’s called a “reading strategy.”

“It’s not enough any more just to teach the little tykes to read. Now they must also be taught to be aware of their metacognitive processes,” writes Margaret Wente in Ontario’s Globe and Mail. The new system seems to frown on reading a book straight through. “Now, the teacher is supposed to stop after every page and ask, ‘What do you think is going to happen next? How do you infer that?’ ”

This seems OK — for older students who have already mastered the language and can view literary works as a whole, not a classroom of very young children traditionally only quantified, rightly or wrongly, by who got to fly up to the Bluebird reading group and who struggled behind with the Wrens. 

Wente adds that to make sure classrooms comply, the young Canadian students are removed from class by visiting experts and grilled on their skills, using words like “schema” and “inference,” Wente writes.

This not only would seem to kill the scant time teachers have already to teach basic phonics and comprehension, but destroy that magical time in life that a little child can feel good about his or her reading accomplishments, and then learn to enjoy a good book.

So I guess this means that coherently reading, “See Spot run” will no longer be enough. Now reading tots will have to consider, “Why might he be running?”

Run, Spot, run. Run while there’s still time to run for the joy of it.

posted by Janie McQueen, author of The New Magic Bookshelf: Finding Great Books Your Child Will Treasure Forever



One Response to “Dick and Jane as comparative lit?”

  1. institutrice Says:

    Maybe the teachers or administrators shouldn’t be using college-level vocabulary, but yes, Kindergarten students should be learning how to explain their thinking. Metacognition is the key to true learning. Giving kids a bag of strategies they can use – and name – will enable them to get through rough spots when no one is around to help them. This may avoid scenarios like a child staring at the ceiling when he got stuck on a word, and when the teacher asked what he was doing, he replied, “I’m waiting for God to tell me the answer.” (A true story.) We need to teach our kids how to think, not just pump out correct answers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s